Disclosure: This article does not seek to glamorize psychopathic serial killers. It merely illustrates the nature of psychopathic serial killers, their crimes and explores what motivates a human being to unmercifully terminate the lives of others.
What is a Serial Killer?
If you were to research in any dictionary, you’d probably come to find the description of a Serial Killer to be something similar to: ‘a person who commits a series of murders, often with no apparent motive and typically following a characteristic, predictable behaviour pattern.’
To take that further through the lens of a criminal investigator, generally speaking, criminologists categorise a serial killer as someone who has committed at least three separate and distinctive murders over a period of greater than 30 days.
We can categorise the following, somewhat familiar names, under this title: – Harold Shipman, Myra Hindley, Ian Brady, Fred West and Peter Sutcliff.
But how do we assess and analyse what truly makes a serial killer?
The Medical Psychological Approach
The Medical Psychological approach has been used for a long time now. After all, it’s one of the most accepted and effective means of clarification to determine psychopathic tendencies and enables researches to generalise on what, in particular, “makes” a psychopath.
But is this enough of an explanation? Does it justify the action? Does this truly sum up what it means to be a psychopath? Wouldn’t many Serial Killers and Psychopaths slip through this net?
This leaves questions unanswered, and more questions in tow, so let’s delve further into the murky work of Psychopaths & Serial Killers.
What is a Psychopath?
So, we might ask, what is a Psychopath?
Many people have tried to designate a fitting explanation for what it means to be a Psychopath. Indeed there is a similarity to the word “Sociopath”. There is very little difference in terms of description, characteristics and variables so closely associated with psychopaths.
One of the most popular and acknowledged descriptions of a psychopath is as follows: “A person with a psychopathic personality, which manifests as amoral and antisocial behaviour, lack of ability to love or establish meaningful personal relationships, extreme egocentricity, failure to learn from experience, etc.”
The Hare Psychopathy Check List
The Psychopathy Checklist, otherwise known as the Hare Psychopathy Checklist (revised), and now the Psychopathy Checklist—revised (PCL-R), is a psychological assessment tool most commonly used to assess the presence of psychopathy in individuals.
The Hare PCL
The Hare PCL checklist looks into the varying levels and degrees of the following components:
Incapacity to Love
The idea is to see what quantity an individual has as each of the above qualities. If an individual scores highly on most of these classes; then they are displaying psychopathic tendencies. It would be with these tools that you can discern whether an individual is a psychopath, or just displaying psychopathic tendencies.
It is important to remember that although an individual may display psychopathic characteristics, this does not necessarily make them a psychopath. Also, it is important to take note that it does not follow that those who display psychopathic tendencies always go on to be serial killers.
Psychopaths tend to live within these emotions & characteristics as a norm; whereas most human beings could perhaps relate to displaying a portion of these characteristics throughout bad periods of their life.
Applying Psychopathy to Business Skills
Just as criminal psychopaths are held accountable for a greater share of crimes than their numbers would suggest, so too organisational psychopaths may be partially responsible for more than their fair share of organisational misbehaviour in the workplace including accounting fraud, stock manipulation, unnecessarily high job losses and even corporately induced environmental damage.
There is a fantastic article written by Clive Roland Boddy from Middlesex University Business School in Australia. The paper defines organisational psychopaths as being those psychopaths who excist at an incidence of approximately 1% of the general population who work in organisations.
In conclusion; this paper suggests that having organisational psychopaths running corporations that are themselves, at best, amoral is a recipe for negative consequences. Read the article here
The Perfect Job for a Psychopath
Although psychopaths, in general, represent a relatively small percentage of staff in a workplace – they can do enormous damage when placed in senior management roles. Psychopaths are usually most commonly renowned by a higher level within corporate organizations and their actions often cause a ripple effect throughout an organization.
You might have cracked it by now, or it may even come to you as a surprise; but you wouldn’t have to look far to find psychopaths in most professional walks of life.
Here’s a list of the most common workplaces you may find people with psychopathic tendencies:
Call Centre for Insurance (Shallow emotions; lacking empathy, cold-heartedness)
Surgeon (You may say their feelings aren’t fit for purpose)
Special Services (Cold heartedness, lacking guilt-obvious dangers!)
Police Officers (Superficial charm, lacking guilt, cold-heartedness)
Sales (High intensity, manipulation, remorselessness)
Psychopathic doesn’t mean Serial Killer
When most people think of psychopaths, Hannibal Lecter typically springs to mind, but actually, being psychopathic doesn’t necessarily mean that you’re a serial killer – or even that you’ll break the law.
Actually, within the framework of clinical psychology, a psychopath is someone with a distinct cluster of personality traits including charm, charisma, fearlessness, ruthlessness, narcissism, persuasiveness, and lack of conscience. With this in mind, you can see there’s a broad spectrum which must be considered to determine someone a psychopath, someone who displays psychopathic tendencies or a Serial Killer.